Avatar photo

Is “Teamwork” an Oxymoron for Online Learning?

  Reading time 5 minutes

Students are not fond of teamwork, especially when it’s online. That is one of the findings of my dissertation, which explores the relationship between online students’ interpersonal needs and interaction preference. Nine years have passed since I received my Ph.D., and this unfavorable feeling toward teamwork still seems to be present to a large extent for online students.

Both of the two online students invited to speak at our DePaul Online Teaching Series (DOTS) program stressed that they were not interested in building the so-called learning community or social network through any collaborative project. One of them pointed out that after contemplating the costs and benefits of conducting a group project, he decided to give it up. “That two points for the grade isn’t worth the pain of having to deal with a guy [the assigned team member] who had never returned my calls or e-mail,” M. J., a student from the School for New Learning, told us.

The fact that students are thinking about whether “it’s worth it or not” sends a strong signal to faculty and online-course designers. Is the teamwork required by the course worth the “extra” time and effort that students have to put in? The answer to this question depends on the goals and objectives of a course. As with all the other learning activities, the use of teamwork should be driven by the desired outcomes of a course. Rethink incorporating any team project if you don’t expect or cannot afford the time for students to meet the following objectives in a course:

  • Multiple perspectives among students
  • Team-building knowledge and skills
  • Competency in technology-mediated communication
  • An understanding of various processes of learning (or “no one right ‘path’ to the result”)
  • Resolution of both cognitive conflict and affective conflict

I admire course quality standards that make collaborative learning an optional item rather than a required one, because as powerful as it is, this strategy might not be appropriate for every course or every discipline. But if you do find a strong match between the course goal and the teamwork activity, do it very seriously by giving it enough time, points, and support to make it “worth it” for the students.

I came across an article this month by Staggers, Garcia, and Nagelhout on “Teamwork through Team Building: Face-to-Face to Online,” in which the authors argue that “teamwork most successfully occurs after team building, and too often this team building is lacking in online environments.”   I think this is the exact reason why teamwork has become an oxymoron for many online courses: it has been thrown at the students without anything to prepare them for it or any guidance to support them (one online introduction isn’t enough).

Over the past ten years, I have been working with Dr. Pete Mikolaj, a professor from the School of Business at Indiana State University, to experiment with collaborative problem solving in the online environment. We’ve used his insurance and risk-management courses as the test bed to implement a number of strategies to engage students in a group project, which serves as the main outcome of the course. Among the various ideas we’ve tested, the following strategies were found to be very effective for online teamwork:

Heavy Weight on Teamwork

  • Make the project weigh 50 percent of the total score or more (since it constitutes a major goal of course)

Heavy Weight on the Process of the Teamwork

  • Give 50 percent weight to the process (involvement) of the project and 50 percent to the product (final report)
  • Interim evaluation given about six weeks into project based solely on process (teamwork)

Frequent Progress Monitoring

  • Weekly project log required from each team member
  • A weekly team log is produced
  • The log builds accountability and transparency

Clear Policy on Reward and Punishment

  • Peer/self evaluation allows +/- 15 percent deviation from team grade to create individual grade
  • Self-evaluation counts one third and peer evaluation counts two thirds
  • Individuals can be fired from the team for nonperformance

Guidance from Faculty

  • Weekly synchronous session with the instructor that primarily involves discussion of projects. Sessions are recorded and available for viewing throughout the term
  • Sample project reports from prior classes are available from the first week of the semester

When it comes to online courses, the choice of teamwork is not “to do or not to do” but rather “to do it well or not to do it at all.”  So, before adding any teamwork into the learning activities, think twice about the “why,” and then (if it’s a good fit), work hard on the “how,” because that is the only way to make teamwork work.

Avatar photo

About Sharon Guan

Sharon Guan is the Assistant Vice President of the Center for Teaching and Learning at DePaul University. She has been working in the field of instructional technology for over 20 years. Her undergraduate major is international journalism and she has an M.A. and a Ph.D. in educational technology from Indiana State University. She has conducted research on interpersonal needs and communication preferences among distance learners (dissertation, 2000), problem-based learning, online collaboration, language instruction, interactive course design, and faculty development strategies. She also teaches Chinese at the Modern Language Department of DePaul, which allows her to practice what she preaches in terms of using technology and techniques to enhance teaching and learning.

6 thoughts on “Is “Teamwork” an Oxymoron for Online Learning?

  1. Sharon: As a beginning Instructional Design student, I have many questions. I enjoy reading the posts on this site, and am still trying to departmentalize all the different subjects.

    Your post is about the online collaboration of 2 or more students on a project. The solution ideas you suggest to stimulate successful collaboration mostly seem to be geared towards the rewards/ punishment the students will receive upon (non) completion of the project.

    Has any research been done on how to encourage collaboration through the design of the project itself? The reward/punishment approach doesn’t seem to take the ‘desired outcome’ of learning the material into account.

    Thanks for your insight in this matter.

  2. Dr. Guan,

    I am also a beginning student in an Instructional Design and Technology program that is being offered strictly online. I enjoy perusing the IDD.com website because I find useful information that relates back to either what I am currently doing or what I hope to do in the future. When I mentioned to my Director that I was completing this program online, his first question was, “Do you have to do a bunch of group/team work?”

    Like him I was hesitate about completing group assignments for many of the reasons that are outlined in your post. Often times the grade is not worth the amount of work that actually has to be put into a group assignment. At times the goals and objectives of the assignment are not clear to the students making them feel as though they are being forced into a ‘just because’ type of assignment. As students how can we dispel of our stereotypes surrounding group assignments and the assumption that our partner or partners are not going to pull their own weight?

    In my opinion, group assignments are most beneficial when all parties involved have something to learn and gain. Do you find it more difficult to complete group or team work assignments in an online community? Also do you see any benefits in complete more collaborative projects in an Instructional Design program?

    Regards,

    Evette

  3. Hi, Sharon, thanks for these reflections and suggestions. I have found that in F2F courses, some students really want to work with a partner (though less often with a larger team) and others don’t. In the past I have made it an option but not required it–I made the expected quantity of work a little higher for the partnership, but not so much greater as to discourage the co-operation.

  4. Hi, Sharon!
    I have found group work to be challenge for many students who (1) never had much experience in it, (2) are introverted in class and maybe overall, and (3) feel personally injured by ‘free-riding’ by one or more group members. I have used “group contracts” in the past to communicate the seriousness of the work modality. I look forward to hearing from the teaching team how we could do this better online. Thx!

  5. Thank you for this insightful article. I myself have found that there is always one or two people who coast and do nothing with the team and there is where most of the complaints come from.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.